Skip to content
Ontogenesis Technologies

AI & Agentic AI

Enterprise RAG and knowledge intelligence

Answers drawn from your own documents, with citations — and honest silence when the answer is not there.

Rack-mounted servers with blue status lights

Retrieval-augmented generation is the most reliable way to make a language model useful on private knowledge. It is also where most implementations quietly fail — not in the model, but in retrieval. If the right passage is never fetched, no amount of prompting recovers it.

Read more

We treat retrieval as the engineering problem it is: how documents are chunked, how hybrid keyword-and-vector search is tuned, how permissions follow the user rather than the index, how freshness is maintained, and how the system behaves when it genuinely does not know.

Permission-awareness is not optional. A knowledge system that answers from documents the asker could not otherwise open is a data breach with a friendly interface.

What you get

  • Answers with sources, not unverifiable assertions
  • Retrieval quality that is measured rather than assumed
  • Access control preserved end to end

What's included

Ingestion and chunking
Connectors for document stores, intranets, ticketing systems and databases, with structure-aware chunking rather than fixed windows.
Hybrid retrieval and reranking
Vector similarity combined with keyword search and a reranking pass, tuned against a labelled question set.
Permission-aware access
Retrieval filtered by the requesting user's entitlements, enforced at query time and not merely at ingest.
Citations and traceability
Every answer linked to its source passages so a reader can verify rather than trust.
Retrieval evaluation
Recall and precision measured on a golden question set, so tuning is evidence-led and regressions are visible.
Freshness and lifecycle
Incremental re-indexing, deletion propagation, and versioning when source documents change.
Where this applies
  • Expertise concentrated in a few people who are constantly interrupted
  • Policies and procedures spread across years of documents
  • Support agents searching several systems to answer one question
  • Onboarding that takes months because nothing is findable
Technologies
  • Pinecone
  • Weaviate
  • ChromaDB
  • Milvus
  • LangChain
  • Hugging Face
  • Python
How it works: the retrieval pipeline
  1. 01

    Ingest

    Connectors pull from document stores, intranets and ticketing systems.

  2. 02

    Chunk

    Structure-aware splitting that respects headings, tables and clauses.

  3. 03

    Index

    Embeddings plus keyword index, with entitlements stored alongside.

  4. 04

    Retrieve

    Hybrid search filtered by the asking user's permissions.

  5. 05

    Rerank

    A second pass orders candidates by actual relevance.

  6. 06

    Generate

    The answer is composed only from retrieved passages.

  7. 07

    Cite

    Every claim linked to its source so a reader can verify it.

  8. EVAL

    Measured, continuously

    Recall and precision tracked on a golden question set. Most RAG systems fail at retrieval, not generation — so this is where the work goes.

Permissions are enforced at query time, not only at ingest. A knowledge system that answers from documents the asker could not otherwise open is a data breach with a friendly interface.

Ready to talk about Enterprise RAG?

Tell us about the process or problem, and we'll tell you plainly whether this is the right starting point.

Or reach us directly at info@ontogenesistechnologies.com · +91-9999101853