Service
Application modernization
Move off legacy incrementally, behind a facade, with every step independently valuable and reversible.
Big-bang replacement of a working system is the highest-risk option available and is chosen surprisingly often, usually because the incremental path was never costed properly.
Read more
We favour the strangler pattern: put a facade in front of the legacy system, move one capability at a time behind it, and keep the old path available until the new one has earned trust. Each step delivers something and each step can be reversed.
Not every application should be modernised. Part of the assessment is identifying what to retain, what to retire, and what genuinely warrants investment.
What you get
- Risk spread across small reversible steps
- Faster, safer releases
- A clear decision for every application in the portfolio
What's included
Portfolio assessment
Legacy re-engineering
Monolith to microservices
Cloud-native transformation
API modernisation
UI/UX modernisation
Where this applies
- A monolith too risky to change and too central to replace
- An unsupported platform or an approaching end-of-life dependency
- Release cycles measured in quarters
- A modernisation case that keeps failing on cost or risk
Technologies
- Kubernetes
- Docker
- AWS
- Azure
- React
- TypeScript
- Python
- FastAPI
Engagement models
- Modernisation assessment. Three to four weeks. Portfolio disposition, target architecture, sequenced roadmap.
- Pilot migration. One capability moved end to end to prove the pattern and the estimate.
- Programme delivery. Sequenced incremental migration with continuous operation of the legacy path.
- Co-delivery. Joint teams, with knowledge transfer as an explicit deliverable.
Ready to talk about Application Modernization?
Tell us about the process or problem, and we'll tell you plainly whether this is the right starting point.
Or reach us directly at info@ontogenesistechnologies.com · +91-9999101853